Facebook to the rescue

Last week, I went out to run some errands. When I returned to work I realized I had lost my license. I hate that! Now I’d have to call all the places I went to and hope they found it, get back in the car, drive over there…. And what if I didn’t find it? It was Friday and I’d be without it through the weekend, hoping the whole time that I don’t get pulled over.

There were three possible places: Fred Meyer, the liquor store, and a hardware wholesaler. As I was navigating Fred Meyer’s automated phone tree, I got an e-mail:

Subject: Drivers license found

“We found your license today at Portland Fasteners.  We close at 430pm today and
will re-open Monday at 7am.”

Thank God! But how did they do that? How did find me? How did they send me the message? Facebook! Of course! In their infinite wisdom, they conveniently searched for my name and sent me an e-mail. Problem solved.

I have to say, I felt slightly uncomfortable that they were able to find me so easily, but then again, they found my license, so I was ok with it. Anyway, I went to get it and as the guy handed it to me, I half-jokingly said, “I hope you didn’t look at my pictures.” He smiled, winked, and walked away.



Viral Fabrication

“The objective of the RepRap project is to give away the designs for a machine that anyone can use to make many of the goods that we all have to currently buy and anyone can use their RepRap machine to make more RepRap machines for other people.”

Keri Collins, Narrator

 

RepRap from Adrian Bowyer on Vimeo.

Will the trends of self-reliance and re-generation spur the viral growth of the RepRap movement? Could the spread of home manufacturing with fossil-fuel based materials prove environmentally detrimental as people will fabricate more stuff than they need? Will this take humanity into new levels of conservation innovation? Desktop manufacturing is a game-changer - for the good or bad remains to be seen.

 - Keith Gerr

PS - 3D printing for new tissues and organs? chekit



The Sovereign Consumer

Politics, economics, culture, technology, health, environment, religion, sexuality - We are living in a tsunami of change. Top-down power is giving way to bottom-up power. Individuals over institutions. Dialogue over monologue. Transparency over privacy. Sharing over hording. Regeneration over landfill. Love over hate.

Some believe it’s an enlightened period that leads to collective, empathetic goodness. Some predict it’s just another nail in mankinds coffin.

Others, like me, aren’t so sure. But that’s no excuse to not to try and make sense of it all - especially in a professional marketing capacity. Because, afterall, marketing is about knowing the consumer. Being able to stay in-step and one-step ahead so that needs are met and value is delivered.

In an effort to develop empathy for the average consumer, a collaborator of mine (Mo Morales) and I took a deep dive into the human experience. Not a quantified study, but a wide-eyed, open-minded quest. Our conclusions brought us to the Sovereign Consumer. This person is:

Extremely Cynical - does not trust the media and increasingly less trustful of brands

Technology Enabled - wired, fired up and aware of his ability to influence friends and the world around him through networked devices and applications

Needs Community - seeks influencers from whom to learn and peers with whom to share - all in the name of staying perpetually relevant

Owns Self-Determination - determines factors (e.g. value, loyalty) on his own terms

Promotes New Social Contract - growing expectation for institutions to embrace ethical and responsible practices in the pursuit of profit

Commercially Engaged - continues to define himself by brands he selects and rejects

Privacy Disabled - fears loss of personal control of incoming messaging and outgoing information

Needs Anti-Community - defines himself by who he is not

Suffers Status Anxiety - constantly aware of his place in society, ability to ascend, as well as how far he can fall

Ethically Ambivalent - selective application of personal values

It’s just the take of a couple dudes - we don’t claim the above to be science nor the archetype to be complete. Though we do claim to be honest with our thoughts. What’s your take?

 - Keith Gerr



New Online Measurement Report for 2009

I just downloaded my own copy of the Sample Online Measurement and Strategy Report 2009 from Econsultancy and Lynchpin.

There are some great tidbits in this sample report. Since I have been primarily focused on becoming an expert in Google Analytics implementation, the sections that discussed WA tools and GA were of particular interest to me.

It is exciting to see that, while GA is still not necessarily the most widely used tool, it is definitely gaining popularity. According to this study, 23% of the organizations surveyed were using GA exclusively (up 9% from last year’s study). This is encouraging news because there are still a lot of people out there who judge quality based on the price tag of the tool. GA has so much to offer and is very customizable.

Also interesting (and not surprising), the most common frustrations are:

1. Poor knowledge about what to measure
2. Limited time and/or resource to interpret the data
3. Lack of senior management buy-in
4. Lack of coherent strategy / business objectives
5. Cost associated with a paid-for solution

I look forward to seeing some of these frustrations dissipate as more and more companies see the value in their online measurement strategies. Heck even having one and/or trying to establish one is a step in the right direction. Yay Opus (never hurts to toot our own horn once in a while, right?)!

Thanks Econsultancy & Lynchpin for the sample report! Hopefully I’ll be able to get my hands on a full copy one of these days.


kate jorgensen | web analytics specialist